Google hillary clinton scandal. McCain can throw a scandal at faster than she can than she can deflect them.
She is cute, but I ...( 6 months ago by chumashfalcon)
She is cute, but I really doubt you could. Go jerk off
Apart from her ...( 6 months ago by ewannama)
Apart from her looks and the main point here, I'm curious about the smug "Democrat" comment at the end. Can someone explain why it's not silliness?
Granted that Fox deserves criticism for lots of things, but calling candidates Democrats is not derogatory. Seems to be fair and clear, since all candidates are in the democratic (representative) process, and the DNC lately seems to want to coopt that adjective. Some of my friends are happy to identify themselves as "Democrats," so what's her beef?
Saying "democrat ...( 6 months ago by withat)
Saying "democrat candidate" (singular, sounds more partisan) instead of the grammatically correct "democratic candidate" (sounds more pleasant, sounds more American) is a cheap way for republicans to try to make the Democrat brand "sound" negative. With low-information voters, "sounds negative" is all you need.
When the host is ...( 6 months ago by Blingitor)
When the host is referring to the Republican candidates by name but not doing so with the democratic guests, thats pretty low. It would be like us being in a business meeting together and I call everyone by their name when addressing them, but when i call on you i say "Yes woman?"
Is this advice or a ...( 6 months ago by YawnGod)
Is this advice or a request?
Blingitor - I don't ...( 6 months ago by ewannama)
Blingitor - I don't think that's what happened, but thanks. Withat is probably right, but I just don't see this as an intentional plot as some left-leaning critics suggest. I've heard lots of respectful people, like Tom Ridge, use Democrat in the singular with no bad faith. And the "low-information" masses are not as sheep-ish or ignorant as some suspect.
Blingitor, you are ...( 6 months ago by truthlovver)
Blingitor, you are right. olbermann is full of shit, completely irresponsible.
I hate Fox News but ...( 6 months ago by kkvh4026)
I hate Fox News but any1 being objective would see that Fox News actually has been the most fair in covering the Democratic race. They hate both Democrats so trash them both, yet the have some that are objective & acknowledge when Hillary wins than be in denial. Foc called the pensylvania result 20 mins b4 CNN & MSNBC which were stalling 2 pretend it was really competative. They created his momentum, yet when Hillary wins Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island & Pensylvania in a row they say she's lost. Sad.
FOX called it with ...( 6 months ago by limbopete)
FOX called it with ONE FUCKING PERCENT of votes tallied. Who the hell cares if she pulled it off in the end- calling an election on 1% is irresponsible and misrepresentative. And she HAS lost- the numbers are just not on her side. She built her momentum too late : )
Wow Keith, nice ...( 6 months ago by chuckerchucker)
Wow Keith, nice objective analyst you bring in. Maddow is in the tank for Obama and so are you. Not a chance you will ever bring in someone that doesn't agree with everything you say bathtub boy.
Maddow doesn't ...( 6 months ago by d3v07)
Maddow doesn't agree with lying old bitches.
Hillary lost texas ...( 6 months ago by d3v07)
Hillary lost texas when you combine in the Caucus voting, remember. They had both, I know it's hard to count past one for some of you hillary voters without falling asleep or having a stroke.
Hillary is a named ...( 6 months ago by gentemia)
Hillary is a named defendant in a CIVIL FRAUD TRIAL going on right now in Los Angeles court. RIGHT NOW!!
go to LASUPERIORCOURT. ORG
click under Civil column: CASE SUMMARIES
enter case #: BC304174
And she shouldn't.( 6 months ago by millgiass)
And she shouldn't.
Jesus, what are the ...( 6 months ago by Radacoin)
Jesus, what are the qualifications for a swing state these days? Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington are all going Democratic, I guarantee it.
Exactly. Obama's ...( 6 months ago by STPfuzzDemon)
Exactly. Obama's people are now trying to bullshit us that, get this, KANSAS and IOWA are now swing states! Fact is Barrack baby didn't fool the folks in the midwest right from the start and now has insulted them. He continues to insult us in Muchigan by refusing the re-vote and suggesting that he should get to share the delegates there EQUALLY(!) with Clinton. Further proof of his ELITIST way of thinking and blatant disreguard for the citizens of Michigan.
I agree, it is ...( 6 months ago by STPfuzzDemon)
I agree, it is disturbing to see how anti-Hillary Clinton MSNBC has been. It is a case for "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the party left me..." for the Clintons and all of their supporters.
Yeah, the so-called ...( 6 months ago by STPfuzzDemon)
Yeah, the so-called "Texas Two-Step." That pisses me off that in TX (Democrats have no chance in hell there in November + SHE beat Obama in the more important popular vote there---NEWSFLASH: the Fall election is WINNER TAKE ALL! in 50 states, not 48; this includes MI and FL) they get to vote twice, but MI and FL votes don't even get counted once.
Obama is an ...( 6 months ago by STPfuzzDemon)
Obama is an automatic win for McCain in CRUCIAL states like FL and MI (thanks to Obama
screwing the voters there) whereas as Clinton would be an easy victory in those states and more of a sure bet in OH and PA as well. The rest of the states are pretty much decided already. That being said, OBama is NOT the 'frontrunner' any more. Plus, we never know when Rev Wright will lower the boom on Obama. When he accuses Barrack baby of being an 'Uncle Tom' it is all over but the crying.
"Obama is an ...( 6 months ago by limbopete)
"Obama is an automatic win for McCain in CRUCIAL states like FL and MI (thanks to Obama
screwing the voters there)"
What the fuck world are you living in? Back here in REALITY MI and FL screwed themselves by not following party rules. It's as simple as that. You are nuts if you think Obama can't take McCain. Either candidate will crush him once Dems can actually coalesce.
he said he wouldn't ...( 6 months ago by Radacoin)
he said he wouldn't be against a revote, the problem is it would cost Michigan and Florida hundreds of millions of dollars to have a revote, and the DNC has said they aren't willing to pay for that. Both states agreed not to have their primaries before Feb. 5th but they broke the parties rules. You should be mad at the party officials of MI for moving their primary date.
The Clinton ...( 6 months ago by hugewarning)
The Clinton campaign's debts vastly outweigh it's cash on hand, the Clinton campaign also has had to fire more campaign workers than any other campaign in this race. Whether or not her campaign will still be in one piece by November is debateable.
I would also like to point out that there is plenty of dirt on Clinton (more so than Obama) but the republicans are not bringing it up right now because they want to run against Clinton.
by the way Obama leads CLinton by roughly 130 delegates.
The ( ...( 1 month ago by obamaxxx)
The (Far-left-ultra-liberal-socialists) have gone too far.
They even kidnapped the DemocraPic party.
America needs new McCarthy NOW to clean it from this filthy commie Millionaires and Billionaires hypocrites before it is too late. They are spreading their false thoughts like cancer with the help of New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, Newsweek and Time.
If this thing continues the USA is doomed to segregate into 5 or 6 different fighting countries; AN ULTIMATE DREAM OF THE MARXISTS.
go to LASUPERIORCOURT. ORG click under Civil column: CASE SUMMARIES enter case #: BC304174
screwing the voters there) whereas as Clinton would be an easy victory in those states and more of a sure bet in OH and PA as well. The rest of the states are pretty much decided already. That being said, OBama is NOT the 'frontrunner' any more. Plus, we never know when Rev Wright will lower the boom on Obama. When he accuses Barrack baby of being an 'Uncle Tom' it is all over but the crying.
I would also like to point out that there is plenty of dirt on Clinton (more so than Obama) but the republicans are not bringing it up right now because they want to run against Clinton. by the way Obama leads CLinton by roughly 130 delegates.
They even kidnapped the DemocraPic party.
America needs new McCarthy NOW to clean it from this filthy commie Millionaires and Billionaires hypocrites before it is too late. They are spreading their false thoughts like cancer with the help of New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, Newsweek and Time. If this thing continues the USA is doomed
to segregate into 5 or 6 different fighting countries; AN ULTIMATE DREAM OF THE MARXISTS.