Jeff King: He got his bachelors in electrical engineering in the 70s from MIT, although he has been working as a physician for the last 25 years. Another "expert" who is not an engineer. Take two tablets of bs and call him in the morning.
`yubedude` spams me ...( 1 month ago by truthtrekker)
`yubedude` spams me all the time. He believes any non-Masonic source of information to be faulty.
make sure you watch SEPTEMBER CLUES on google video. Best 9/11 documentary bar none!!
Also check out my video on Understanding the US Constitution
Peace!
if i could delete ...( 1 month ago by reaton33)
if i could delete this b.s. comment i would. believing 9/11 wasnt what it seems is one thing, but to project a conspiracy in such a way is disgusting and throws many people seeking the truth off coarse. you should punched in the lips repeatedly.
you literally think ...( 1 month ago by reaton33)
you literally think the people standing around, in other buildings, in other areas below didnt see the planes? the footage taken by the person from the highway faked their own video? the firefighters on the ground doing that video didnt see a plane? go watch a bigfoot movie and come back when you grow up. however this 9/11 investigation by our 'government' is complete crap and we need the real truth.
Where's all the ...( 1 month ago by muzicmaker2001)
Where's all the footage of the second plane from directly underneath the Towers? After all, the first plane just hit and there was a HUGE gathering of media/reporters underneath the Towers? It wasn't the firefighter's video, it was the Naudet Bros.
youtube*com/watch?v=2ETZDA2HmyQ
Most of you guys ...( 1 month ago by kevin72bearvly)
Most of you guys are complete retards. There are dozens of high rise buildings just in this country that have caught fire and not collapsed, thats not surprising. But here, you are talking about a plane that has almost the same dimensions as the footprint of the building slamming into it at about 400 MPH causing a fire. The plane causes extensive damage to the building supports which then heat up due to the fire, begin to loose their strenght, then start to bend, resulting in the collapse.
Those Boeing 767 ...( 1 month ago by kevin72bearvly)
Those Boeing 767 aircraft that hit the towers were by far the largest to ever hit a building. Even the architect said that the buildings were only designed to withstand a direct hit by a Boeing 707 and the planes fuel was never taken into account at all. If you damage 1/4 to 1/3 of all of a buildings main supports, then heat up the rest, what do you think will happen. These buildings had thousands of tons of weight above the impact areas that no longer had the support they needed.
You use yours. That ...( 1 month ago by Shack11)
You use yours. That thing was traveling VERY fast(Somewhere between 200-400). Think about a gun. It hits a wall, you can see the hole on impact, then it expands when it explodes.
Now you see the plane, titanium would slice right through the dry wall, having a cookie cutter outline. It then explodes, sending debris everywhere, and making the hole bigger, like a gun.
The last part requires an IQ over 50 It hits, it blows up, now it is in large pieces, the tower collapses. Pieces are pulverized.
Enter logic. Flight ...( 1 month ago by muzicmaker2001)
Enter logic. Flight 11 was allegedly traveling 470 mph when it hit the North Tower. Flight 175 at 590 mph (impossible for a 767, BTW) South Tower. Both easily entered steel framed buildings and left "cookie cutter cut-out imprints. Flight 77 was traveling 530 mph when it hit a steel reinforced concrete building (Pentagon) and most of the plane supposedly disintegrated upon impact?? Simple common sense...
You can pitch a fit ...( 1 month ago by 4ezMoney)
You can pitch a fit if you want - still, you can never prove a lie and you can NEVER rationalize hollow aluminum aircraft wings slicing through steel beams and several floors of concrete. That is impossible and only someone very misinformed or who wants to deter others from the truth would propose such gibberish. There were no planes on 911 - get used to it.
all this is all to ...( 1 month ago by carleecatt)
all this is all to crazy. I dont believe that their was no plane. My aunt was there and she saw the second plane hit. with her own two eyes.
She would'nt lie to me no matter what was going on.
but as for the government being invovled.
No doubt in my mind.
I don't understand why we couldnt have seen the plane after it was recovered....
I don't understand why there is no REAL video footage of the pentagon being hit...
Some things just don't add up...
R.I.P( 1 month ago by zakkmoonye)
R.I.P
of course there was ...( 1 month ago by lucasleivia)
of course there was a fucking plane you bolox, we all saw the fucking planes. we also saw a controlled demolition after the planes hit in order ot bring the building down
dont be so ...( 1 month ago by lucasleivia)
dont be so ridiculous you fucking idiot, of course there were planes, thats not what this video is about!
the pentagon was ...( 1 month ago by lucasleivia)
the pentagon was desined like a fucking bomb shelter it was meant to sustain the impact of just about anyhting that hit it. its a far more dense construction than the wtc. this video is evidence that the plnes couldnt bring down the buildings at freefall speed, not a theory about remote control drones or missiles or whatever other lunatic bullshit you are proposing
Should human flesh ...( 1 month ago by muzicmaker2001)
Should human flesh pass through a bomb shelter? Adding this up: 99% of plane disintegrated upon impact, but the passenger carriage with the passengers made it through the wall intact. Please stop...
"Army Staff Sgt. Mark Williams discovered the scorched bodies of several airline passengers, they were still strapped into their seats. The stench of charred flesh overwhelmed him."-USA Today, 09/13/2001
dont be so sure ...( 3 weeks ago by bweazel)
dont be so sure there were planes. true it would be insanely difficult and time crunched to pull something off like overlaying planes on explosions, but computers are damn good these days. watch september clues. it's very interesting.
YOU FUCKING MORONS! ...( 2 weeks ago by Acoustic29)
YOU FUCKING MORONS! of course there were planes, however; the video just indicates that there was another factor in the "incident".
A short video for ...( 2 weeks ago by mskydolphin)
A short video for the debunkers,
Copy the title below and then paste it in
the you tube search window above
9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
Enjoy, msky
I've seen wood ...( 2 weeks ago by brokencasket)
I've seen wood beams penetrate car doors at high velocity, but the real question is...is the story as told by the media really true?
I say no......why? Because 911 isn't the only thing to investigate...
Jeff King ... an ...( 1 week ago by BlazingFerret)
Jeff King ... an ELECTRICAL engineer who never was an "MIT engineer" ---
I can see how his expertise might be valuable if the WTC doorbells short-circuited and caused the fires.
However, this clown has about as much knowledge of structural engineering as my veterinarian.
Got some other totally unqualified morons?
Nail salon technicians? proctologists? History professors? Theologists?
Gee, we are SO impressed.
Complete ...( 5 days ago by VCat2006)
Complete reconstruction of the airplane wasn't done because it's obvious that airplanes fail when flown into a frickin building.
As for the NY WTC: Pause at 4:46 and read all the text. The overlay text says "Core Columns Left Out To Make Pancake Theory Look Plausible", which is a big fat lie compared to the diagram right behind it.
Airplane fuel ...( 2 days ago by bignewgame)
Airplane fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt steel behind asbestos. Every steel column and girder was wrapped with asbestos to prevent this sort of thing in the first place. What mixture of elements could melt steel that was on the airplane? How did it get past airport security? If it wasn't on the airplane then it was in the buildings. Someone has some explaining to do. By LAW, how much would it cost to remove asbestos from all 3 towers? More than rebuilding?
What about if you ...( 18 hours ago by muzicmaker2001)
What about if you don't crash a plane into a building and it still collapses straight down in the case with WTC7?
make sure you watch SEPTEMBER CLUES on google video. Best 9/11 documentary bar none!!
Also check out my video on Understanding the US Constitution Peace!
youtube*com/watch?v=2ETZDA2HmyQ
She would'nt lie to me no matter what was going on.
but as for the government being invovled. No doubt in my mind. I don't understand why we couldnt have seen the plane after it was recovered.... I don't understand why there is no REAL video footage of the pentagon being hit... Some things just don't add up...
"Army Staff Sgt. Mark Williams discovered the scorched bodies of several airline passengers, they were still strapped into their seats. The stench of charred flesh overwhelmed him."-USA Today, 09/13/2001
Copy the title below and then paste it in
the you tube search window above
9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! Enjoy, msky