Controlled Demolition of Wachovia Building Midtown Atlanta

Uploaded By:
MikeSchinkel

Save & Share

Tags: 615 Atlanta Avenue Building Controlled Demolition Georgia Implosion Midtown North Peachtree Piedmont Street Wachovia

Find more videos in the "News" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

On September 30, 2006 at around 8:15am the old Wachovia Building at 615 Peachtree Street in Atlanta, Georgia USA was imploded using controlled demolition techniques. This was filmed from North Avenue just east of Piedmont Road. After the blast nothing much happens except the dust cloud rising.
You can also see a slide show of my photos on my blog at http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blog/ and do a search for "Wachovia".

See more videos uploaded by MikeSchinkel

Related Videos

Building demolition goes wrong	Apartment Building Controlled Demolition	Controlled Demolition vs. WTC Collapse

Demolition	Ready for 2008-The Demolition Of Stadium	Controlled Demolition

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

@okedoke1234: What ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

@okedoke1234: What evidence? Did you not read the report? Molten metal flowing and in pools, Sulfidation of the steel, Plume-timing during collapse, early drop of north tower antenna, eyewitness accounts of flashes & explosions, Rapid collapse vs. Conservation of Momentum and Energy, Flames from Jet Fuel lasting only minutes. And that's just a few. Or is this not "evidence" to you? If so, I ask what "evidence" do you need to question the official report?

No, Mike, it is not ... ( 1 year ago by okedoke1234)

No, Mike, it is not evidence and has been debunked. I cannot and will not get into this due to youtube's ridiculous 500 character limit here. Thank you for allowing me to speak, most CTists block you. I ask once more to come to IMDB and have a discussion about it with no character limit. My username there is USAFMXOfficer_2007.

@okedoke1234: The ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

@okedoke1234: The various official reports have been debunked too. All we ask for is an independent investigation. Is that too much to ask?

Oh, btw, I'm not a ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

Oh, btw, I'm not a "Conspiracy Theorist" which is a phrase used in ad-hominem attacks used to discredit anyone who asks questions rather than address those questions. I'm a rational thinker who has concerns that the official story is not as credible as *some* of what people call "the conspiracy theories." All I want is for an independent investigation to be performed.

@okedoke1234: BTW, ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

@okedoke1234: BTW, I just went over to IMDB to check out the discussion but there is far too much disrespectful name-calling for my tastes. I try my best to only engage in respectful debates but it clearly wasn't respectful over at IMDB for this topic so forgive me but I won't be wasting my time over there.

@okedoke1234: I ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

@okedoke1234: I don't get the vehemence of the "debunkers." It's as if debunkers take questions about 9/11 as personal attacks. When I see such as an intense emotional response to something that should be analyzed pragmatically it makes me either suspicious or it removes my ability to respect those who react. Continued...

...continued. If ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

...continued. If someone can't dispassionately discuss issues I believe they are either guilty or define their own self-esteem with the issue. For all I know debunkers might be operatives tasked to squelch dissent or more likely their verbal defense of the USA has previously been so vigorous that learning otherwise would eliminate meaning from their lives and be too much to handle emotionally. Otherwise I can't understand why "debunkers" fight so hard to "debunk."

So now I'm blocked? ... ( 1 year ago by okedoke1234)

So now I'm blocked?
Typical.

You are blocked? I ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

You are blocked? I didn't block you (at least if I did I didn't do on purpose, might have clicked a wrong button.) Why do you think you are blocked?

I was not blocked. ... ( 1 year ago by okedoke1234)

I was not blocked. My mistake.

Mike- Come on over ... ( 1 year ago by okedoke1234)

Mike- Come on over to the JREF Forums, conspiracy board. Just google JREF Forum. No name calling or obscenity allowed. Just good discussion among a lot of folks about 9/11. And no 500 character limit.

Thanks for the ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

Thanks for the invite but I don't think so. I didn't see a anypne arguing against the official story, only lots people congratulating each other over ion of self-styled "debunking" and at few too many comments like "Operation Wingnut Cracker", "the insanity of the "'trooth movement'", etc. to believe they know how to be respectful of others. Discussing 9/11 there would declaring there are no such thing as witches in Salem; no room for an honest analysis and the lynch mob would come out in force.

Well Mike I've ... ( 1 year ago by okedoke1234)

Well Mike I've tried several times. I'm done here. You have fun here on the woefully inadequate YouTube comment section. Impossible to have a real discussion with a character limit. You know where I'll be, ready to discuss your theories.

I understand. ... ( 1 year ago by MikeSchinkel)

I understand. Unfortunately I simply don't have time to explore my concerns with a group who have already made up their mind to oppose any such exploration. Too bad, because if the official story is a cover up it's likely to happen again, next time only worse.

sad we have to see ... ( 11 months ago by ThEpErsOnLiGHts)

sad we have to see other buildings demolished to break out of the programming we had about 9-11, we've been put out of action and can only be dumb or fascinated about the propaganda matrix, if you form a group you'll be infiltrated by intelligencia before you know it, if you protest you'll get beated and no one takes protesting seriously anymore for it had been successfully neutralized in america,

@ThEpErsOnLiGHts: ... ( 11 months ago by MikeSchinkel)

@ThEpErsOnLiGHts: Amen.

Hey Mike, here is ... ( 11 months ago by okedoke1234)

Hey Mike, here is some good reading. Interested in your thoughts on this.
wtc7lies(dot)googlepages(dot)com/Ryan_Mackey_Griffin_NIST_Review_1_1.doc

That this is 192 ... ( 10 months ago by MikeSchinkel)

That this is 192 pages long! I unfortunately don't have the time to try to consume all that. If it were a 10 page executive summary maybe...

OK. It seems you ... ( 10 months ago by okedoke1234)

OK. It seems you have an excuse for everything I attempt to present to you. Interesting. Carry on then.

Sheesh. I have a ... ( 10 months ago by MikeSchinkel)

Sheesh. I have a life, which includes other things besides fixating on this issue. If I had time I would probably build a website about it all, but I don't have the time; I have to make a living. So please don't insult me.

There you go Mike, ... ( 10 months ago by okedoke1234)

There you go Mike, you just summed up the CTist movement perfectly. No one has any time to look at anything that might bring into question their theories. They only have time for a 3 minute youtube video, and then they are instant experts! I am saddened by the death of critical thinking in this country.

cool ( 10 months ago by flowergirls100)

cool

w w w (dot) ... ( 8 months ago by okedoke1234)

w w w (dot) ae911truth (dot) info - Here is the TRUTH about "architects and engineers for 911 truth"!

?!? ( 3 months ago by MikeSchinkel)

?!?

Tell a friend: