The Western Media Bias?!

Uploaded By:
Hereticxxii

Save & Share

Tags: bias bloggers ccp china communism epik freedom human justino media olympics press rights tibet

Find more videos in the "News" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

Korea's EPIK Justino points out that opponents of Tibetian Autonomy gain little credibility by cherry picking bad reporting in the west.
Chinese Blogger Beat to Death: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/01/11/china.blogger/index.html?iref=topnews Chinese Democracy Activist Imprisoned: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/04/02/china.activist.sentenced.ap/index.html AUTONOMY FOR TIBET NOW!!

See more videos uploaded by Hereticxxii

Related Videos

stop lying ！帝国主义亡我之心不死，所有中国人觉醒吧！	UK Hypocrisy Towards Chinese People	Age-old Western Racism Towards Chinese Lives On

TIBET WAS, IS AND WILL NEVER BE PART OF CHINA	Vietnamese vs Cantonese	Re: Don't Free Tibet

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Oblivously form ... ( 6 months ago by Hereticxxii)

Oblivously form better sources than you. I can not help it if you are bent on justifying state sponsored terrorsim.
As for my sources? I doubt you asked that question in earnest but we can easily point to the wealth of knowledge in UN reports, NGO reports, primary sources, and my own meandering experience.

My goal is to face ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

My goal is to face reality as it is.
It is no China specific.
Up to now, you keep failing to integrate any of my comments.
I underline the powerlessness of freedom of speech in the Western world to inflect on the course of a policy. One example among many in this comment section. You show you cant integrate this fact in your way of reasoning. You are the one backing up China's current government by evading this questi
on. Not me. Obviously, China is on the path to build a very...

similar government ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

similar government as in the West.
That is what you fear. You dont care about human rights and stuff. Human rights for you and your ilk are just a weapon to further your domination agenda. You are okay with domination as long as you are the dominant.
That is why you keep harping on China using human rights as their weak point.
You dont care if freedom of speech is useless in the western world because you agree with the current social order and relish the opportunity of denouncing it...

while perfectling ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

while perfectling knowing that this order will not be endangered because freedom of speech is no longer subversive.
You dont care about food riots and stuff. In this convo, you took the dominant stance on the third world "I can consider to agree maybe that etc..." It all depends on your good will. You are a power hungry one.
That is all. Please get out of the human rights stuff. Because you dont care human rights. You dont care universality. You dont care about humanity.

You care about ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

You care about domination. You care about power. Speak your mind as it is. Do not travest it.

And you continue to ... ( 6 months ago by Hereticxxii)

And you continue to try and frame critics of China as advocates of Western Crimes. If you are being sincere, you can keep your relativism. You know full well that resources available to those who advocate for human right and right now is the time to press China. The rising price of food and its effect on the worlds most vulnerable? If you actually have an effect suggestion on how to tackle that, lets hear it. That would be far more productive than using it to excuse the CCP.

Your view of human ... ( 6 months ago by Hereticxxii)

Your view of human rights as a western construct and weapon of oppression, has merit, however it is the very same cover that most of the third world's worst criminals have used for murder, genocide, and the like, especially in former colonies.

You speak of facing ... ( 6 months ago by Hereticxxii)

You speak of facing reality as it is. I assume that you mean facing the reality that most of human history and especially the rise and domination of the West is paved in blood. It is unacceptable that humanity should carry on in this way. You hint that human rights are only achieve after prosperity, when free speech is nullified.

This is a great ... ( 6 months ago by Hereticxxii)

This is a great error. As one it presumes that Prosperity and human rights are naturally at odds with eachother. This is what a dominant class has a vested interest in believing. But as we are seeing in places like Africa and South America, this not the case. Are we biased against China? Only if you believe that you can only do one thing at a time. In a globalized world those who can express free speech have an obligation to speak out when our brothers and sisters can not.

More and more with ... ( 6 months ago by Hereticxxii)

More and more with technology this is becoming mostly a matter of helping spread primary sources. I severely doubt your sincerity as your position seeks to justify the crimes of the Chinese Regime.

Stupid guy! ( 6 months ago by icewine000000)

Stupid guy!

Back again: you are ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

Back again: you are the relative moralitivist. Please assume what you are.
I have chronology of events for me.
Since the beginning, you claim that the actions of the West are the past evading that these actions are main actors in the West situation.
As you are unable to face it, you are the one supporting the Chinese government. Not me.
All you have done since the beginning, is closing the door: " We have done this in the past. It has helped us greatly in building our society prosperity...

but you the others, ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

but you the others, dont do as we have done"
"You have to achieve the same but without doing as we have done"
Latter, you even avowed you have no clue to solve the issue in the third world.
So again, you demand from China what you fail to demand from your own side.
A very supportive attitude to China government.
You are absolutely not interested in human rights. You are interested in power and domination.
Your closing door attitude is the best support to the Chinese government.

Because of this ... ( 6 months ago by TheCZMan)

Because of this kind of attitude, millions of Chinese are flocking behind their government. Your relentless failure to point out the real issue of the way the Western world has achieved what it has is the best support.
Your washing hand attitude completes that.
As long as you will fail to demand as much from your side as you demand from China, please drop down the label of the human rights because obviously they are just a pretext for you.

i never said i ... ( 6 months ago by Rakkasans2006)

i never said i support China cause, i just point out that everything China done the western countries did it too. you can't criticize China if your own country is doing the same thing, it just make your statement lame. even if you are a self proclaim righteous person who denounce your own government.

genocide? if i ... ( 5 months ago by albobear)

genocide? if i remember correctly, americans purposefully marginalized native indians from their lands and wiped out a significant portion of their population. sure china have human rights violations, but so do other nations out there. i mean look at guantanamo bay... somehow you think its justified for americans to hurt others in name of "democracy"? fundamentally this is not a discussion about human rights, but rather is the age-old battle between ideologies of liberal democracy and socialism.

you are not the ccp ... ( 5 months ago by albobear)

you are not the ccp. you are just looking at things from a short-term perspective. china can't just suddenly transform their system. look at what happened to russia in the early 90's. south east asian countries have their own ways to manage their nations and succeeding at doing so without the pressures from paternalistic and self-righteous attitudes of the west (ie. asian economic tigers).

No I do not think ... ( 5 months ago by Hereticxxii)

No I do not think guantanemo bay is justified in the name of democracy or imperialism, or whatever they are calling it these days. How dare you equate supporting human rights in China with advocating for the human rights abuses at Guantanemo. Shame on you.

Array ( 5 months ago by Koreaisbest)

(Great video )
There is no free media in China. students from the
Chinese univeristy whose students were crushed by the tanks at
Taniamen square are not aware of its history! A chinese editor
was house arrested for questioning its govt's approach.
the Chinese are Brainwashed!

Shame on me? That's ... ( 4 months ago by albobear)

Shame on me? That's all you can say when somebody has a credible argument? China is in a transitionary phase therefore a developing nation. Modernized countries such as the USA have had that opportunity to go through such transitions while China is still developing. More like shame on you for your ignorance and your monolithic view on politics.

Array ( 4 months ago by epsilonwolf)

Grow a pair.
Chinese Americans for a Free Tibet!

I agree with ... ( 3 months ago by tcwd)

I agree with aldobear. First of all, the "Shame on you" comment is completely unnecessary. China is still developing. It is unfair to not give it a chance. Have we forgotten so quickly about the Kent State shootings? We don't have the best human rights record out there. Who are we to tell others about morals and human rights when we have violated them repeatedly and downplayed them to the best of our abilities.

Check the wikipedia ... ( 3 months ago by hyperharajuku)

Check the wikipedia press freedom list America is at the bottom only beat by China. I don't condone the Chinese violence or censorship but if you think western media is free your moronic.

brainwashed freak! ( 1 month ago by mandopride25)

brainwashed freak!

Tell a friend: