Advertise On Celebrity Desktop
3,894 Celebrities,
Movies & TV Shows

9,439 Web Links
9,214 Wallpapers
20,000+ Videos

celebrity screen savers and wallpapers
 : Actresses
 : Actors
 : Movies
 : Musicians
 : Models
 : TV Shows
 : Sports
 
celebrity wallpapers
 : Hollywood Stars
   :: Actresses
   :: Actors
   :: Legends
 : Movies
   :: 2008
   :: 2007
   :: 2006
 : Musicians
   :: The Ladies
   :: The Guys
   :: Groups
   :: Legends
 : Supermodels
 : Television Shows
 : Japanese Idols
 : Sports
 : Image Uploader
 : More >>>
 
celebrity videos
 : Music Videos
 : Hollywood TV
 : Movie Clips
 : TV Clips
 : 20,000 more >>>
 
postcards
 : Mug Shots
 : Actresses
 : Actors
 : Musicians
 : Models
 : Upload Your Own
 : More >>>
 
fun and games
 : Smack!
 : Mystery Celebrity
 : Funny Face Warp
 : Without Makeup
 : News & Gossip
 : Odd Baby Names
 : Stupid Quotes
 
shop
 : DVDs
   :: Under $7.49
   :: Under $9.99
   :: TV on DVD
   :: Box Sets
 : Mobile Ringtones
   :: Wallpapers
   :: Screensavers
   :: Videos
   :: Games
 
feedback
 : Comments
 : Submit A Link
 : Suggest A Celebrity
 : Link To Us
 
help center
 : Create Your Own
   Software
 : Installation Help
 : FAQs
 : Spyware / Adware
 : Anti-Virus Programs
 : Security Pitstop
 
   

LHC - Large Hadron Collider - Messing with the unknown

Uploaded By:
ProjectStorm

Save & Share

Tags: Accelerator Black Collider Dangerous Dark Energy Hadron Hole Holes Large LHC Matter Micro Particle Risk Strangelets

Find more videos in the "Tech" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

**NOTICE** I'm not supporting anything in this video, I simply read an article, found it interesting and decided to share it, nothing more. This video is NOT a wacky conspiracy theory and NOT intended to scare you, just make you aware. The risk of anything going wrong is low, but the risk is there nonetheless. As I say in the video, I have an interest in things such as this, but I don't agree messing with things that are not properly understood that could be extremely dangerous for our planet as well as us. Now nothing is likely to go wrong when the LHC is switched on in May, but if it does, and remember that's a BIG if, then we are in some serious shit because it would be irreversible.
Some links you should check out: Large Hadron Collider (LHC) http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/ Higgs boson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson Micro black holes (not fully understood) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole Strangelets http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strangelets Magnetic mo
nopoles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopoles Supersymmetry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersymmetry Hawking radiation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation Cosmic censorship hypothesis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_censorship_hypothesis

See more videos uploaded by ProjectStorm

Related Videos

CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC)LHC-Large Hadron Collider [1/3]LHC-Large Hadron Collider [3/3]
cern-large-hadron-collider-lhc.htmlcern-large-hadron-collider-lhc.htmlcern-large-hadron-collider-lhc.html
LHC-Large Hadron Collider [2/3]The Large Hadron ColliderThe Biggest Particle Accelerator Ever...(14 of 15)
cern-large-hadron-collider-lhc.htmlcern-large-hadron-collider-lhc.htmlcern-large-hadron-collider-lhc.html

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube
And yet the nuclear ... ( 4 months ago by cadabraa)
And yet the nuclear physicist knew exactly what the possibility would be, even if he thought mankind wouldn't be stupid enough to make bombs out of it instead.... It's lefty behavior but in the mean time that same physicists probably is quite rich because of his work.
Lol, whatever... ... ( 4 months ago by cadabraa)
Lol, whatever... you were meaning to scare people all along, hence why you left it out. The additional info has been on Wikipedia for over a year at least. Besides, knoxrox is right in a way, how can YOU be so sure about something YOU know so little about... ;)
And how can you? ... ( 4 months ago by ProjectStorm)
And how can you? Nuff said.
There you go people ... ( 4 months ago by ProjectStorm)
There you go people. A moronic YouTube user that has to resort to insults to get their insignificant bumblings heard. A simple look at my channel and certain videos would show I do NOT believe in doomsday theories at all. And yes, I believe in "UFOs", as many other people do. No crime or shame in that.
I'm not even gonna ... ( 4 months ago by sneakerset)
I'm not even gonna take the time to waste the time to think about a response to your ramblings,but hey kids,here's a new word-obligerated-which means obliterated(hammered)and belligerent.
On second thought,I ... ( 4 months ago by sneakerset)
On second thought,I will take a moment to respond to your insinuation...You like to pretend that you are in the know-when you know next to nothing.Too bad the attitude you've shown gives you away-a guy who just couldn't shut the F. up .Try reading the fine print on videos next time,college genius.That said,don't expect a further response..just hit the highway.Adios,muchacho
I take it you were ... ( 4 months ago by ProjectStorm)
I take it you were replying to cadabraa?
I'm sorry about the ... ( 4 months ago by sneakerset)
I'm sorry about the miscue...yes,that was meant for him.Don't worry,bro..you are da man!When the shit hits the fan, and the bullets start flyin',I'd share a foxhole with you anytime.See ya later,Stormy...and have a great weekend.
Hmm... who should I ... ( 4 months ago by infinit888)
Hmm... who should I believe ProjectStorm or the world leading 6000 physicists (which contain 5 nobel prize winning laureates), mathematicians and engineers who actually built the LHC. I'm sorry but the answer is painfully clear to me unless of course you have something other to offer than a conspiracy?
Why don't people ... ( 4 months ago by ProjectStorm)
Why don't people bother reading the video description? I am NOT stating, ANYWHERE, that ANYTHING bad will 100% happen. As I said to someone else, I simply read afew articles and it interested me enough to make a video. I am not pushing this on to anyone as fact, just theory.
I guess that is ... ( 4 months ago by infinit888)
I guess that is precisely the problem. Theory is not the right description for what you have to say. In science a theory is backed up by facts. What you are doing is hypothesizing. Frankly many people can not distinguish between these differences and they really do get scared.
Then they shouldn't ... ( 4 months ago by ProjectStorm)
Then they shouldn't be so gullible. This is nothing compared to doomsday theories on this site, such as Planet X/Nibiru/2012 and all that rubbish. My intention is/was NOT to scare anyone. As I said, I read afew articles on this and decided to make the video. Only afew words at the end of the video are actually mine anyway. The rest came from another site.
"Then they ... ( 4 months ago by infinit888)
"Then they shouldn't be so gullible." You are aware that you are on YT right? The cradle of superstition and conspiracy theories. Mind you I don't blame you for the gullibility of others just be aware of the fact that they are and they are willing to destroy scientific progress. It would be a real shame if the LHC never could be used.
there are a whole ... ( 4 months ago by sickoftards)
there are a whole bunch now who want to stop this... anyway you know....people are often wrong, how many millions still think george bush is a good president for example? how many voted for hitler? how many thought the world was flat? how many believe so many things and are proved wrong later.
sickoftards I don't ... ( 4 months ago by infinit888)
sickoftards I don't quite understand the point you're trying to make or what lead you to your observations could you please elaborate your point?
sure...i only mean ... ( 4 months ago by sickoftards)
sure...i only mean that from my understanding there are a number of scientists who are concerned about dangers, so when you say 6000 scientists, although that sounds impressive, those 6000 could be wrong. 6000 people have been wrong about lots of things. the fact is, there is a small minority, but nonetheless some scientists, who consider this project dangerous. given the fact the worst case scenario is ending civilization entirely, people are not completely unjustified in their concern.
the fact is for ... ( 4 months ago by sickoftards)
the fact is for most of us the advantages of such a project are not clearly visible, however that small sliver of ultimate danger, however slight, is enough for many of us to think...I would prefer if such things werent happening. It is not like there some external threat at the moment forcing us to engage in such extreme experiments.
anyway...ill step ... ( 4 months ago by sickoftards)
anyway...ill step back a little from what I said before. if there isn't truly at least a small group of scientists who want to stop this...its hard to take the risks seriously. if it is dangerous then at least a minority of the scientific community should say so...i spent some time on the web and it seems most of the complaints are coming from non-scientists. scientists are people too, if they thought this would end the world, I am sure there would be at least some objections
Your observations ... ( 4 months ago by infinit888)
Your observations are accurate. I know of a physicist who worked at CERN that said the same thing. Noone is interested in ending the world esspecially not the atheists under these scientists. If there'd be a conceivable treath the LHC wouldn't have been built in the first place. In my opinion you might find scientists advocating against it. Scientists are humans too it's not that they aren't scared of the unknown. However finding particle physicists against the LHC experiments is very unlikely.
Honestly what would ... ( 4 months ago by Dragonan)
Honestly what would this world be today if all the great minds would have stopped everything they did because people were afraid of what they were doing or said.We wouldn't have the great minds of Galileo,Einstein and Newton.I could go on for ever with names of people told to stop.We would still be sitting around a fire(scratch that because its to dangerous),thinking the world is flat,the sun revolves around the earth. We wouldn't have planes,cars,electricity,books,music and I can go on and on.
Very interesting, ... ( 4 months ago by blackgargamel)
Very interesting, someone translates this in French please!
so, i was thinking, ... ( 4 months ago by loveisbadforyou)
so, i was thinking, this thing is round and looks a lot like the ringwrolds in Halo, and those things could have destryored the univers, so this thing is bad. and, it's not fair that they get that awsom intarwebs teh Grid, which is so fast and would be awsom for fraging some n00bs and should be free for evryone
Don't be afraid. ... ( 4 months ago by zefvor)
Don't be afraid. Particles are too smole to hurt anyone.
Yes mate butthe ... ( 4 months ago by Europidling)
Yes mate butthe problem is that the exper. at the LHC COULD destroy the world the scientists know that but they dont care and say dont worryscientists created car planes ships medications and so on things that never could destroy the world They work with the univers working with the LHC and dont knowig what will happen but they now the risk scientists ceated things like the Nuke and shi t nobody realy need things that ppl kill they are going to kill us all because they want to become famous



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 
:: Copyright 1998-2008 Celebrity Desktop - All Rights Reserved :: Terms of Use :: Privacy Policy :: Search :: Ad Info ::
Webmasters, earn $$$ to support your site with: ValueClick :: Casale Media :: AllPosters :: TotemCash