BBC REPORTED WTC - 7 COLLAPSED 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT FELL!

Uploaded By:
Question1981

Save & Share

Tags: 9/11 BBC COLLAPSE LIE MI6 WTC WTC7

Find more videos in the "News" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

DOWNLOAD LINK(FLV File):
http://www.zshare.net/download/1037262361871bdf/
On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed. This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST. 9/11
was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7. What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder. Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the b
uilding did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails. So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

See more videos uploaded by Question1981

Related Videos

BBC News 24 error, interview job applicant (not taxi driver)	BBC Reports WTC7 Collapse Preemptively	BBC reports WTC 7 fell 23 minutes too soon

WTC 7 Foreknowledge	9/11 Debunked: BBC Early Report on WTC 7 Collapse Explained	New NEWS - BBC Video - WTC 7 - Prior Knowledge

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Good Lord, you poor ... ( 1 month ago by smartbet)

Good Lord, you poor folks are stuck with that moron "notrustbbc" too? What a freaky basterd that guy is!

Someone should find ... ( 1 month ago by Kinkoyaburi)

Someone should find this Jane Stanley and question her about this and tape it. The same should be done with the male journalist (don't know his name). Watching them avoiding answers should be fun. They are perfectly aware of their mistake, I'm sure.

quote: "The BBC has ... ( 1 month ago by Kinkoyaburi)

quote: "The BBC has said for years that their reporters misnamed the collapsed building, and have admitted their error" This video was found on 26th of February, 2007. It's a year and 3 months, mostly. How can BBC state for it "for years". Busted yet again - it's hard to remember all the lies, isn't it.

Which seems more ... ( 1 month ago by zeppelinesque)

Which seems more likely? That a foreign reporter, in the middle of a frightening, dangerous situation accidentally mis-identified a building or situation, or that a secret cabal of government and military agents determined to murder thousands of it's own citizens DECIDED TO LET THE BBC IN ON THE PLAN? If you were planning something like that, would you let a foreign reporter go on TV and "spill the beans"?

2 screnns - did ... ( 1 month ago by jkcph)

2 screnns - did anyboddy see this? ?????
- take a careful look at the left screen
(appears many times in the video, when zoom, i see a second screen - or it the downtown behind Jane a blue screen? are the cameraman trying to give us a hint? i see to "live" shots where smoke are going towards each other. Conclusion we look may be at one screen and one window?, or one of them are
video? or may be some other interesting explanation. Smells bad -- like all the other 911 stuff

it's not a screen. ... ( 1 month ago by sisc108)

it's not a screen. you can see on other youtube vids. It's actually a bay window. The 'screen' is an angled piece of glass. The image is a reflection. watch? v=Yg3n18HAIfo (Cut space after question mark. Silly YouTube should allow links without us having to resort to this kind of trickery.)

BullShit! there was ... ( 1 month ago by LlamaMightyHoof)

BullShit! there was bombs in the towers

these people used ... ( 1 month ago by hhein01)

these people used to stand with us and now they love to make fun of us and it is just very disturbibg to me because if england was attacked we would come without second thought

sorry i wos told at ... ( 1 month ago by benjaminlee2)

sorry i wos told at 3pm UK time that this has happened so maybe ur times are messed up

Do all the people ... ( 1 month ago by smartbet)

Do all the people with common sense question WHY it took nearly 6 years for this video to hit the internet?? If the BBC really reported the collapse of building 7 before it happened it would have been EVERYWHERE the very next day.
Don't be foolish........this is a hoax and nothing more.

smartbet, I saw ... ( 1 month ago by Orcishstra)

smartbet, I saw this report on the day you idiot

Array ( 1 month ago by smartbet)

Idiot?? Really??
So your dumbfuck ass wants everybody to believe that you were sitting there watching this BBC report and said to yourself "OMG it's only 4:54pm in New York right now and I'm sure that Building 7 is still standing" Shut your stupid ass up. None of us Americans even new what building 7 looked like
before it's collapse but you somehow know it was still standing during this report? Give me a break loser! Why wouldn't you report the mistake right away then?

Pretty damn ... ( 1 month ago by smartbet)

Pretty damn impressive stunt for an 11 year old child don't you think?

Just type 'David ... ( 1 month ago by vsssarma)

Just type 'David Rockefeller 9-11' in google search bar and see how many thousands of pages appear ! exactly 666.

Exactly military ... ( 1 month ago by purpleprinc3)

Exactly military precision was used to carry out 9/11. State sponsored that's a security anaylyst, now ask yourself, which state is dumb enough to do that? None, becuase it woudln't benefit them in any way whatsoever. Iraq, Iran? Sure Saddam would attack the people who supplied him with his weaponary, and who he know's he cannot defeat, simple economics, america has bigger guns. Iran, think there people would let them risk there entire country for small revenge? It's a joke.

Ahh crazy ... ( 1 month ago by purpleprinc3)

Ahh crazy conspiracists! I just noticed 'racist' in the word, hmmm conspiracy's!!! Let's hide the facts were making profit from 9/11 unlike every other company that has killed starved etc to secure it's finances and resources... Reichstag fire?

lol, u really think ... ( 4 weeks ago by sepiasilence)

lol, u really think any government could keep something this big under wraps, any american who found this out wud leak it straight away, u give the US government to much credit, ur a bunch of crazy bastards, maybe it was a mistake in reporting who knows

BBC's Richard ... ( 4 weeks ago by vsssarma)

BBC's Richard Porter had a weak explanation - that there were news reports by then that WTC-7 had already collapsed and Jane used this rumour to make her news. But BBC is supposed to verify the news before reporting. What happened to their professionalism ? Or were they part of the conspiracy ?

As for WTC-7, there ... ( 4 weeks ago by vsssarma)

As for WTC-7, there appears to have been a lot of foreknowledge. Silverstein talked about it. Firemen told the same. Giuliani told the same well in advance as he vacated his office in WTC-7. Employees were to told to vacate the building by afternoon as the building would collapse. Bush and Cheney have to explain how they managed to bring down WTC-7. Have they engaged Controlled Demolition Inc. for the job ? How can OBL do it from a place thousands of miles away ?

What a stupid ... ( 3 weeks ago by sb1282000)

What a stupid explanation. I love ignorant people like you. Phil Hayton has acknowledge that the bbc received few minutes before that moment a wired text stating "WTC7 has just collapsed!!!" SO WHICH VERSION ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE, YOURS? OR THE BBC?

U2?? ( 3 weeks ago by sfyke)

U2??

Listen up, shills: ... ( 1 week ago by b1y1e6af)

Listen up, shills:
Your game is up buddy. We know 911 was an inside job and before you go about trying to cover up false flag terrorism with your stupid and idiotic comments, maybe you would better serve your masters by at least getting your stories coordinated and timmed better before you actually carry out the ev
ent,as evidenced in this video. What a bunch of dumbasses.

Suggesting this is ... ( 2 days ago by moseley101)

Suggesting this is just a case of journalistic error is SO naive. What are the chances of naming just one south-Manhattan building (choosing between about 300 structures), and just happening to ACCIDENTALLY hit the nail on the head 15 minutes before the actual event. And this doesn't take into account the fact that the BBC normally verify more than any other news outlet (which is why it's normally considered the slowest news network). That's crazy! The truth will set you free!

The BBC have a ... ( 20 hours ago by capricious71)

The BBC have a programme on about this on Sunday 6th July.

Tell a friend: