Origin of the Universe - Stephen Hawking (3 of 5)

Uploaded By:
Gravitationalist

Save & Share

Tags: Bang Big Cosmology Function Hawking Hawking-Hartle Physics Stephen Theoretical Universe Wave

Find more videos in the "Howto" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

Stephen Hawking gives a lecture on the Hawking-Hartle no boundary universe.
Lecture given to a sold out crowd at the Berkeley on March 13 2007. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/hawking/universes/html/bound.html

See more videos uploaded by Gravitationalist

Related Videos

Origin of the Universe - Stephen Hawking (5 of 5)	Origin of the Universe - Stephen Hawking (4 of 5)	Stephen Hawking, Black Holes, and The Creator

Stephen Hawking interviewed on "Yair Lapid"	Professor Stephen Hawking Takes Zero-Gravity Flight	Professor Stephen Hawking in Star Trek TNG.avi

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Can you told for ... ( 4 months ago by Etimespace)

Can you told for Stephen Hawking that i know how Universe really works?
All atoms expanding all a time in space who dont expanding or bend. And thats the way it is. Check it out my video No gravity is video where i told how "gravity" really works. Idea from Kuopio is video where i told how visible Universe really MOVES Also magnetism, No Dark matter and how kineti
c energy transfer Thank you for you

Dr Hawking a ... ( 4 months ago by YesOuiSi)

Dr Hawking a physicist, he is NOT a clergyman or preacher. The purpose of his work is to try to understand the magnificent things that our creator has given all of us. He is talking about stars and galaxies and how they behave. The stars and the galaxies are THINGS that God created. Trust your clergyman for information about God. Trust a scientist for information about the THINGS that God created for all of us.

The last sentence ... ( 4 months ago by rewinn)

The last sentence of this video is well worth pondering. It would appear that our minds are constructed so as to be unable to conceptualize time with no beginning. After all, in ordinary experience, there would be no need to perceive time as just another spacetime dimension, any more than "seeing" microwaves would be helpful. As a result, we are built to believe in a temporal origin, and therefore a temporal Originator ("First Principle" or "God") regardless of the actual facts.

it is impossible to ... ( 3 months ago by CyrusGuitar)

it is impossible to comprehend the idea of the beginning, without understanding relativitiy. This is why so many religious people are so dismissive of it; it is because they have never studied the properties of spacetime.

Whenever I speak to ... ( 3 months ago by Rimmer7)

Whenever I speak to a clergyman or preacher about science, they seem to not know even the utter basics and when I ask them about God none of them agree with eachother. Why the hell should I trust a clergyman?

hawking is closer ... ( 3 months ago by Reido2828)

hawking is closer to god then u bastard! god didn't say a thing in the bible we wrote it and what hawking is doing is getting inside the mind of creationism so piss off

whats a singularity ... ( 3 months ago by spencertron88)

whats a singularity? does anyone know? they sound important, and im no physics professor

Idiot...he is an ... ( 3 months ago by PDodds77)

Idiot...he is an Atheist. he DOESN'T believe in God. As far as he and I are concerned he has proved God couldn't have existed, God didn't create anything because you guessed it; like Father Christmas he is made up to control us silly humans.

what Crap you speak ... ( 3 months ago by PDodds77)

what Crap you speak. Your God can kiss my Ass and if he is real i can't wait to go to Hell away from his bullshit. God wrote a bible? haha why would he do this rather than come down to earth and spend 15 seconds showing us he is real. Dream on Godo! what a crack-pot!!

I never even said ... ( 3 months ago by Reido2828)

I never even said im christian yet you spazz like a moron. Use have a bit of intellectual rigor and do some research on the guy. He has expressed views of a god that passed the law or a mathematical god etc. I don't believe in the bible either so don't assume a conclusion with out observation because assumptions is what religious crackpots do assuming god did this so we don't need to go any further like a moron of your standard. Type in Jeffrey Armstrong on youtube and watch a skeptic get beat

(mathematics) the ... ( 3 months ago by iamygod)

(mathematics) the values or the range of values of a function for which a derivative does not exist. (physics) a point or region in spacetime in which gravitational forces cause matter to have an infinite density; associated with black holes. there you have it.

lol! aren't you ... ( 3 months ago by otherworldz)

lol! aren't you worried you'll go to hell?

Who, me? Why would ... ( 3 months ago by Rimmer7)

Who, me? Why would I be? It's not like any such place exists.

sure it does, it's ... ( 3 months ago by otherworldz)

sure it does, it's called the republican party.

If you live in ... ( 3 months ago by Rimmer7)

If you live in America, perhaps. Here they're called Sverigedemokraterna. >_>

Thumbs down to you ... ( 2 months ago by PDodds77)

Thumbs down to you buddy. 'Spazz' haha Idiot!!

Watch the Jeffrey ... ( 2 months ago by Reido2828)

Watch the Jeffrey Armstrong vide?

so time does not ... ( 2 months ago by 666XZ)

so time does not exist it only appears to us that exist because we have memory of the past event? Please response.

singularity is ... ( 2 months ago by jesustoastlol)

singularity is another word for the center of a black hole

It sure looks to me ... ( 2 months ago by notruthsinscience)

It sure looks to me as if there ain't much truth here either.
My name? 1) circularity of induction; 2) a theory is by definition a model or conceptual apparatus; 3) Equivalent theories may describe the same ontology; 4) Science research is by definition open-ended; 5) Metaphysically, it may not make too much sense to assume there is a single unique way in wh
ich things stand; 6) Proven limitations of our human truth-finding faculties. ...

For example. Energy ... ( 1 month ago by Etimespace)

For example. Energy of sun was 5 billion years ago much in the smaller area space which does not expand or arches. Now At That time energy of Sun forms 10 billion light years to be owning energy ball which inside also we are! Isn't Sun be presumably changed less for the dense? What? Also energy of the all' sun atoms cores has at the same time changed less for the dense. Also energy of our atoms cores has changed less for the dense energy! Onesimpleprinciple com

how are there ... ( 2 weeks ago by hiddenentity777)

how are there objects 100 billion lights away if the universe is only 15 billion years old. how could there be anything farther than 15 billion light years away logicaly even if that object is moving at the speed of lite.

Assuming the ... ( 5 days ago by digemail)

Assuming the Universe was created 15 billion years in the past (from some reference point), and it expanded outward in all directions from a central explosion at almost the speed of light, it would now be just under 30 billion light years in diameter. There would be no objects 100 billion light years away.

Actually the theory ... ( 14 hours ago by dataloreforever)

Actually the theory of inflation believes the universe expanded from the big bang fast than the speed of light.

Tell a friend: