Ron Paul on Meet the Press - 12/23/07

Ron Paul on Meet the Press - 12/23/07 - Part 1 of 4

Uploaded By:
yd2008

Save & Share

Tags: 2008 election meet paul presidential press ron the

Find more videos in the "News" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

http://www.YouDecide2008.com - 2008 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul appears on Meet the Press with Tim Russert on December 23, 2007.

See more videos uploaded by yd2008

Related Videos

Ron Paul on Meet the Press - 12/23/07 - Part 2 of 4	"Meet The Press'" Tim Russert Misquotes Senator Barack Obama	Ron Paul on Meet the Press - 12/23/07 - Part 3 of 4

Bill Richardson Vs. Ron Paul	CBS Late Show : Top Ten : Presidential Campaign Trouble	Ann Coulter Analyzes Ron Paul's Meet the Press Interview!

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

I love Ron Paul. ... ( 8 months ago by imanerd36)

I love Ron Paul. One of the Smartest men on earth. He was wrong about losing revenue though, all that money goes to the Big Banks which own the "Federal" Reserve.

AdamSonOfJohn Ron ... ( 8 months ago by LoonyRonPaul)

AdamSonOfJohn Ron Paul had some great answers, didn't he? "A lot." "I don't know the exact number." "I don't know the individuals." But the Paultards keep insisting that Ron Paul did great. Their delusions are hilarious!

moonshot5 Yes, ... ( 8 months ago by LoonyRonPaul)

moonshot5 Yes, shame on Russert for actually asking Ron Paul some hard questions, which Ron Paul couldn't even answer properly. If you Paultards can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen and go back to World of Warcraft. Paultards! LOL!

I know. It sounds ... ( 8 months ago by AdamSonOfJohn)

I know. It sounds like he's really thought all of this through. You know, sometimes I sit and think of how a Ron Paul presidency would actually look if A.) he'd actually won, and B.) got all that he'd wanted. It's almost hard to imagine how scary it would be because he's got so many bad ideas. It's not worth even thinking about when it's much easier to imagine how al-Qaeda would view an American withdrawl if the Dems win. I don't fly a white flag.

Ron Paul, the ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

Ron Paul, the incredible idiot. He thinks Iran has no army, no navy, and no air force and therefore would never attack Israel. Ron Paul doesn't know how many troops we have overseas or what they are doing there or why they are there.... but he wants to bring them home anyway.

I keep thinking ... ( 8 months ago by AdamSonOfJohn)

I keep thinking he's about to say, "We can save up to 15% or more by switching to Geico."

AdamSonOfJohn ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

AdamSonOfJohn That was funny!

Am I right? I can ... ( 8 months ago by AdamSonOfJohn)

Am I right? I can totally imagine in the first wide shot a Gecko sipping tea on the table with the guys.

AdamSonOfJohn ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

AdamSonOfJohn Whenever I see Ron Paul, I picture a character from Revenge of the Nerds or maybe a librarian. I could see him sipping tea with a Gecko!

keep cracking jokes ... ( 8 months ago by cbgames)

keep cracking jokes while Dr. Paul is the only one left that knows jack about economics and the cost of our empires. when we have another depression you RP haters will have to think about what we could have had. you "libs" won't have nothing but your fascist, socialist system even if you were lucky. Ron has much respect for his record so check your facts.

cbgames Basically, ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames Basically, Ron Paul's position is that the people who have been attacking us for years don't want us on their continent...so we're leaving. He's allowing the enemy to dictate policy. Neville Chamberlain did the same thing with Adolf Hitler. Paul and Chamberlain are one in the same. They don't understand their enemy. They desire to give the enemy anything it asks. Their mantra is "PEACE AT ALL COSTS".

cbgames: Ron Paul ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames: Ron Paul wants to immediately pull out of Iraq. Why? He says because we have no right to be there, and that it is this war which makes the Islamists hate us. It is the war that makes them want to attack us? Do you know in what boat that puts Ron Paul? In a boat already sunk to the bottom of the foreign policy bad idea ocean with Neville Chamberlain. The name of the boat is Appeasement.

cbgames: Are we to ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames: Are we to abandon one of the only three working democracies in the Middle East to their neighbors, which have a unified mind for its destruction? Are we to do something that irresponsible? Isn't that what Ron Paul is prescribing?

cbgames: Ron Paul ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames: Ron Paul does not understand our enemy. He doesn't understand that they were attacking us BEFORE our initial invasion of their Holy Land in 1991. He doesn't understand that the major complaint Islamists have against America is our recognition and support of Israel. Is Ron Paul willing to retract that support?

cbgames: Ron Paul's ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames: Ron Paul's foreign policy makes us all less safe. He is honest and he is consistent. But he's also honestly and consistently wrong. Ron Paul is just like a senile old grandfather that you can ignore. The statement and philosophy that makes him most unqualified to operate as the chief diplomat for this great country is his belief that the Islamic terrorists now at war with us wouldn't be at war with us if it were not for our meddling in their affairs.

cbgames: If that ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames: If that was directed at me, you are not only wrong about Ron Paul, you are wrong about me being a lib. I have never, or will every, vote for a Democrat. Second, Ron Paul makes some excellent points that McCain and Romney should pick up on. But his other points are so far in outerspace, you never know what to expect from that nutjob.

it was an ... ( 8 months ago by cbgames)

it was an unconstitutional war. for god sakes, doesn't the law matter for elites anymore?

cbgames The UN ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames The UN Charter makes the use of armed force legal in only two circumstances, described in two articles of Chapter VII. Article 42 says that the Security Council may "take such action by air, sea or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security".

cbgames Iraq's " ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames Iraq's "material breach" revived the authorisation of force contained in Resolution 678, the resolution launching the first Gulf war. The ceasefire terms of Resolution 687 suspended but did not terminate authorisation of force. The same reasoning was used in 1993 and 1998 to justify the American and British bombing of Iraq after disputes about weapons inspections.

cbgames The 2003 ... ( 8 months ago by ccgraphics20)

cbgames The 2003 Iraq invasion had been legal under both U.S. and international law, given the October 2002 congressional authorization of force and United Nations resolutions on Iraq. Hussein ignored 17 U.N. resolutions, including Resolution 1441. The Security Council passed Resolution 1441, deciding that "Iraq has been and remains in material breach" of all these resolutions.

I'll have to agree ... ( 7 months ago by NationalMan)

I'll have to agree with Ron on most of what he's saying here. I don't totally agree with the terrorist issues but i'm willing to give it a chance. We SHOULD cutoff the middle east compeletely. No more foreign aid, and no more buying oil from them. If they rot, they just rot. However, there should be a clause in this.... if they atttack us again after we leave, to the degree of 9-11, we will turn the MidEast into a parking lot and there will be no more islamic governments in entire world.

He makes so much ... ( 4 months ago by biffj0)

He makes so much sense! How do people not get it? These brain-washed sheep are so used to big government, it's sad.

Tim Russert died 5 ... ( 3 months ago by ItsFazsha)

Tim Russert died 5 minutes ago. I'm so sad he never had a chance to change his statement from "if we cut the income tax we'd LOSE $1 trillion of revenue" to "if we cut the income tax Americans would have $1 trillion MORE in their pocket." RIP, Tim.

he breaks it down ... ( 2 months ago by dcaudilla)

he breaks it down so simply. learn from the past.

Tell a friend: