+++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW - NOW!!!+++
This, my friends, is the ultimate clip regarding WMD lies - the clip we have all been waiting for. All the lies of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell compiled together, brilliantly done, with some great "extra" material.
+++This clip is now also online with Spanish subtitles - spread the message!! LINK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Am0vKUJy9U
+++Background music: THE KILLERS: ALL THE THINGS THAT I HAVE DONE+++
___
ATTENTION: A shortened version without swearwords is now online - so that you can post this cl
ip in forums in which swearwords are not allowed:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0L5ZQ1usR-w
___
Thanks a lot to my friend Sally from California for bringing this clip to my attention!
Make sure that at the next elections this bunch of liars gets thrown out of the White House - forever and ever.
Th
is clip was created by:
http://www.puppetgov.com
---
By the way: In this scene when Cheney says "it's pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and met with Iraqi officials", Cheney was referring to Mohammed Atta.
---
+++STAND UP, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!!!+++
NOTE: You have wa
tched this clip, and you are STILL not convinced that Bush did anything wrong? Then you should read about the already infamous, top-secret "DOWNING STREET MEMO" - exposing that the West knew very well that Saddam was NOT a threat and that the war was ILLEGAL.
Links:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/to
l/news/uk/article387374.ece
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memo
Excerpt from the Downing Street Memo (about the Cabinet meeting on 23rd July 2002):
"(...)C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitabl
e. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was
little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.(...)
It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that o
f Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action.
There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change."
+++UPDATE+++
Here is another link pro
ving the lies:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sidney_blumenthal/2007/09/turning_truth_into_lies.html
See more videos uploaded by punkie999
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries
in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998
National Socialist means "Patriotic Working Class' go to school and learn something other than stereo typical Prejudices.
Weird.
I'm so tired of morons who talk about "libs" this and "libs" that. In Thomas Jefferson's day, he was a "liberal." Apparently nowadays all "liberal" means is "person who disagrees with current Republican president and hates Walmart."
History lesson Jefferson fought a war against Islamic extremists that had demanded tribute from countries with sea trade. Thomas refused and sent the US Navy and Marines to say no more. After he left office the congress went back to paying tribute. Libs lost their pair in the 60's and have soug
ht appeasement with ANY foreign power that want to destroy the USA.
"I will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Dick Durbin > September 30, 1999
"One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."