RBHT42,
You've got it backwards. The Palestinians need a wall to keep the Israelis out!
Israel lied to cover up its slaughter on the Gaza beach.
To see the wholesale destruction that Israel has caused all over Gaza, google this photo essay by Human Rights Watch:
"Patterns in the Rubble: Home Demolitions in Gaza"
After you've seen these pics, tell me again how wonderful you think the Israelis have treated the Palestinians.
You're living in a dream world, pal.
Coffman, Israel was ...( 3 weeks ago by FlaviaR)
Coffman, Israel was attacked - read the rules of war sometime. Oh, & look into what happens every time Israel tries to give land containing so-called Palestinians on it to Jordan, or any other Arab country. Thanks for proving that you really know less than nothing.
Array( 3 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
FlaviaR,
You are laughable. In 1967, Israel was NOT attacked (only threatened). Nor has Israel ever tried to give land to any Arab country.
Your statements are ridiculous. They are so WRONG that they are comical. You need to read, instead writing this ignorant drivel.
FrankCoffman YOU ...( 2 weeks ago by RBHT42)
FrankCoffman YOU are nothing but a liberal who only knows the view as presented by arabs and the liberals who kiss their ass, like those Morons ISM and the LIARS HRW. You don't want to see the truth as it is.
GREAT Israel is ...( 2 weeks ago by RBHT42)
GREAT Israel is more than happy to oblige, maybe they can use some of that rubble to build more walls. OH and FUCK HRW they are liars and brainwashed liberal idiots.
الرجاء انقاذ أخيه ...( 2 weeks ago by AliAbdulMahdi)
الرجاء انقاذ أخيه المسلم علينا. ونحن على الاطلاق فى العراق. وقد
وقتل اكثر من جيدة المقاتلين.
مؤمن حقيقي من الله
I am sure that I am ...( 2 weeks ago by FlaviaR)
I am sure that I am laughable to someone as belligerently ignorant as you,. I see that you refuse to do as I said & look up the rules of war. When a nation is BLOCKADED, it is an ACT OF WAR. It IS an ATTACK. Israel has ALSO tried to give the "occupied territories" to Jordan, Your refusal to even accept facts, much less look them up, when combined with your childish need to ridicule what you cannot disprove only proves everything I have said about you & others of your ilk.
Thanks, BenJB07, ...( 2 weeks ago by FlaviaR)
Thanks, BenJB07, for posting the numbers. The real story about Israel & Iran is that the US will allow them to take care of the world's problem, as happened when Israel took out Osirak. The world breathed a sigh of relief, & then it was back to business as usual.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
FlaviaR,
You're using a technical definition of war. Yes, Israel was partly blockaded. Sure, that's an act of war. But in common parlance, Israel wasn't physically ATTACKED. Knock off the bullshit.
You're playing with words so you can justify the Israelis continuing 40-year occupation of the Palestinians.
I didn't "refuse to accept facts." I just don't accept your exaggerations and your absurd claim that the occupied territories belong to Israel. Not even Israel makes that formal claim.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
RBHT42,
You don't care about the truth. You just want to excuse Israel's violence. You demanded proof that Israel shelled the beach (which I gave), but you have no proof for the wild notion that the Palestinian mined their own beach.
No, Human Rights Watch are't "liars." HRW is a respected, impartial organization that has also criticized Hamas and Hezbollah.
Dictators and terrorists hate HRW. You have joined the ranks of those who can't stand HRW because it presents the facts about abuses.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
FlaviaR,
What is your point? You seem to think that the "rules of war" justify Israel's occupation of the Palestinians. What BS. Rules of war don't justify that.
The Palestinians didn't attack Israel in 1967, so WTF are you talking about?
Egypt's blockade doesn't justify Israel's 40-year supprssion of the Palestinians.
I merely said that Israel wasn't ATTACKED in 1967. Everyone knows that the word "attack" isn't equivalent to "blockade" -- and it doesn't justify Israel's occupation.
Israel didnt lie, ...( 2 weeks ago by RBHT42)
Israel didnt lie, its just people like you love to suck on Arab cock so much you will believe anything...it's like a fashion statement to you. And yes HRW is a bunch of biased liars, no one else would take that line of work. What are you going to claim that ISM are a bunch of heroes instead of morons who buy into arab propaganda.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
RBHT,
OK, now you're talking like a foul-mouthed jerk with vulgar insults and nasty personal attacks. That's your low level discourse. How moronic.
No one has ever called HRW "liars." Nor have you documented any lies. By the way, Hezbollah also hates HRW. Two years ago, Hezbollah tried to disrupt an HRW press conference in Beirut.
So, you are in the company of terrorists and dictators -- all of whom hate HRW because it tells the truth. A vulgar apologist like you can't stand the truth.
Your attempt to ...( 2 weeks ago by FlaviaR)
Your attempt to pretend that it is not you who is *wallowing* in bovine excrement would be funny if you weren't serious. I am right & you are just upset because of it.
What justifies ...( 2 weeks ago by FlaviaR)
What justifies Israel's occupation is the so-called Palestinians' refusal to stop killing as many Jews (not just Israelis) as they can. If the PLO et al would stop, so would Israel, & you know it.
& you can keep insisting that an act of war isn't an attack, but you're only fooling all the willing dupes.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
FlaviaR,
"Bovine excrement"? You've sunk to a new low of crudeness.
You're uninformed. The Palestinian Authority has been negotiating (not fighting) with Israel. Israel recognizes that the PA is trying to work out a peace deal, not "killing Jews."
If Israel wasn't subjugating the Palestinians, there wouldn't be a conflict. Whether a "blockade" (40 YEARS AGO~!) i s synonymous with "attack" is irrelevant. That doesn't justify Israel's occupation of the Palestinians. Your point is senseless.
I hate the fact ...( 2 weeks ago by ronaldo320)
I hate the fact that the lebenese prisoners are said to be terrorists and the isralie soldiers are said to be heros- by everyone, The truth is that both should be niether treated as heros or prisoners, both sides have done horrible things and for that to be focused on one side is barbaric. You say that qantar killed a little girl ( 1 little girl) israel soldiers have probably lost count - this is two sided dont make one the vilan.
let me ask you this ...( 2 weeks ago by yardy151)
let me ask you this:
what justifies the americans occupation of america? america used to belong to native americans (indians).
what justifies the arabs occupation of egypt, syria, jordan etc.???? they were not arab countries to begin with!
*I've* sunk? Well, ...( 2 weeks ago by FlaviaR)
*I've* sunk? Well, if so, I have yet to meet your level in that area, as well as in being "uninformed." If you really think that the PA is "negotiating" with Israel, then I suppose that explains how you can insist that Israel is the one that started it with the so-called Palestinians & not the other way around. But it's nice to see you finally give up on the point where you are also wrong - that a blockade is an act of war, an attack. My point isn't senseless- trying to educate you *is*.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
FlaviaR,
You are RUDE. Your talk about "excrement" is stupid and makes you look bad.
I never said a blockade isn't an act of war. So, stop acting so superior. I said that a blockade (40 years ago -- NOT by the Palestinians) doesnt' justify Israel's occupation of the Palestinians. Your point is IRRELEVANT.
You don't think the PA is really negotiating? Even Israel thinks the Palest inians are negotiating. But you think you know better. Ha. Not even Israel agrees with you. You are clueless.
FrankCoffman, your ...( 2 weeks ago by thelustig)
FrankCoffman, your ignorance amazes me. You should stop watching pallywood.
Non of your so called "facts" are right. You have made your mind and now you are trying to build a case around it.
You should write about things that you know and understand. And I wouldn't write anything that leans on a youtube video... (sorry youtube...)
FrankCoffman, by ...( 2 weeks ago by thelustig)
FrankCoffman, by your logic you should leave the US imidiatly an give it back to the native americans.
Array( 2 weeks ago by FrankCoffman)
thelustig,
Even the Israeli government recognizes that it must give up land (how much is in dispute) to the Palestinians. You don't seem to know what's going on.
My facts are exactly right. You are making irrelevant arguments that not even the Israeli government makes.
ronaldo320 : Samir ...( 2 weeks ago by lb4lyf)
ronaldo320 : Samir Quntar did not kill the lil girl , it was the israeli soldier who were firing at Quntar , the soldiers were firing at samir and by accidentally they shot the girl ,the israelis are not ready to tell the world that those israeli soldiers did that bcoz they are " Hero's " as for Quntar he is considerd as a " terrorist " by the israelis , don't expect the israelis to tell u that they shot the girl this would be a shock for their ppl and the world :)
You've got it backwards. The Palestinians need a wall to keep the Israelis out!
Israel lied to cover up its slaughter on the Gaza beach. To see the wholesale destruction that Israel has caused all over Gaza, google this photo essay by Human Rights Watch: "Patterns in the Rubble: Home Demolitions in Gaza" After you've seen these pics, tell me again how wonderful you think
the Israelis have treated the Palestinians. You're living in a dream world, pal.
You are laughable. In 1967, Israel was NOT attacked (only threatened). Nor has Israel ever tried to give land to any Arab country.
Your statements are ridiculous. They are so WRONG that they are comical. You need to read, instead writing this ignorant drivel.
You're using a technical definition of war. Yes, Israel was partly blockaded. Sure, that's an act of war. But in common parlance, Israel wasn't physically ATTACKED. Knock off the bullshit.
You're playing with words so you can justify the Israelis continuing 40-year occupation of the Palestinians.
I didn't "refuse to accept facts." I just don't accept your exaggerations and your absurd claim that the occupied territories belong to Israel. Not even Israel makes that formal claim.
You don't care about the truth. You just want to excuse Israel's violence. You demanded proof that Israel shelled the beach (which I gave), but you have no proof for the wild notion that the Palestinian mined their own beach.
No, Human Rights Watch are't "liars." HRW is a respected, impartial organization that has also criticized Hamas and Hezbollah. Dictators and terrorists hate HRW. You have joined the ranks of those who can't stand HRW because it presents the facts about abuses.
What is your point? You seem to think that the "rules of war" justify Israel's occupation of the Palestinians. What BS. Rules of war don't justify that.
The Palestinians didn't attack Israel in 1967, so WTF are you talking about? Egypt's blockade doesn't justify Israel's 40-year supprssion of the Palestinians. I merely said that Israel wasn't ATTACKED in 1967. Everyone knows that the word "attack" isn't equivalent to "blockade" -- and it doesn't
justify Israel's occupation.
OK, now you're talking like a foul-mouthed jerk with vulgar insults and nasty personal attacks. That's your low level discourse. How moronic.
No one has ever called HRW "liars." Nor have you documented any lies. By the way, Hezbollah also hates HRW. Two years ago, Hezbollah tried to disrupt an HRW press conference in Beirut.
So, you are in the company of terrorists and dictators -- all of whom hate HRW because it tells the truth. A vulgar apologist like you can't stand the truth.
"Bovine excrement"? You've sunk to a new low of crudeness.
You're uninformed. The Palestinian Authority has been negotiating (not fighting) with Israel. Israel recognizes that the PA is trying to work out a peace deal, not "killing Jews." If Israel wasn't subjugating the Palestinians, there wouldn't be a conflict. Whether a "blockade" (40 YEARS AGO~!) i
s synonymous with "attack" is irrelevant. That doesn't justify Israel's occupation of the Palestinians. Your point is senseless.
You are RUDE. Your talk about "excrement" is stupid and makes you look bad.
I never said a blockade isn't an act of war. So, stop acting so superior. I said that a blockade (40 years ago -- NOT by the Palestinians) doesnt' justify Israel's occupation of the Palestinians. Your point is IRRELEVANT. You don't think the PA is really negotiating? Even Israel thinks the Palest
inians are negotiating. But you think you know better. Ha. Not even Israel agrees with you. You are clueless.
Non of your so called "facts" are right. You have made your mind and now you are trying to build a case around it.
You should write about things that you know and understand. And I wouldn't write anything that leans on a youtube video... (sorry youtube...)
Even the Israeli government recognizes that it must give up land (how much is in dispute) to the Palestinians. You don't seem to know what's going on.
My facts are exactly right. You are making irrelevant arguments that not even the Israeli government makes.