MOON LANDING HOAX - Faked Moon Landing Footage . Cernan

Uploaded By:
moonmovies

Save & Share

Tags: hoax landing moon

Find more videos in the "Howto" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

http://moonmovie.com
MOON LANDING HOAX In this film, when the Lunar Module lands, it touches down violently rocking to the left. However, the moon's surface remains in the same place [to understand this, keep your eyes fixed on the craters seen through the dust]. This is not possible, since the camera was on the LM
itself. But let's assume that the moon's surface remains in absolute sync with the shadow's movement - which it MUST DO. Let's assume that is true. THEN HOW IN THE HECK DOES THE OBJECT IN THE TOP RIGHT-HAND CORNER NOT STAY IN SYNC WITH THE SHADOW??!! Whatever that is, it is not mounted to the L
EM, because it doesn't turn with the LEM's shadow and the distance between it and the shadow is not constant during this violent touchdown. So this is FAKE, FAKE, FAKE. Also, there is no indication by the astronauts of this violent touchdown. None whatsoever.

See more videos uploaded by moonmovies

Related Videos

Proof of moon landing hoax!	Classified Footage: Moon Landing	First Moon Landing 1969

Faked Moon Landing?	Onion Moon Landing	Moon Landing: Apollo 17

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Hey that's a new ... ( 2 years ago by wibblywobbly1)

Hey that's a new observation at the end. I never noticed that before. Amazing how the obvious floats straight by us!

I bet the Moon ... ( 2 years ago by komodoman)

I bet the Moon landings were faked. Bart, you have my moral support! :)

The reason for ... ( 2 years ago by euromarkus)

The reason for there being no jerk of the camera can
be easily explained by shows like Fear Factor when they
strap a camera onto the contestant with the lens pointing at their faces.
Everything is seeing jerking EXCEPT the camera because it is the camera that is being jerked.

No everything is ... ( 2 years ago by moonmovies)

No everything is not jerked. The moon's surface is not. Look again.

he's not very ... ( 2 years ago by theduderinok)

he's not very convincing.its possible that probes and cameras were able to make it to the moon but humans could not survive the van allen belt and therefore were never there.

My vote is next ... ( 2 years ago by powerpop812)

My vote is next time there is a nuclear reactor meltdown, send the clean up crew in there with those ''radiation proof" space suits. Surely they can withstand that if they could withstand the Van Allan belts. ;-)

"I lived on the ... ( 2 years ago by montezumasrevenge)

"I lived on the moon for 3 days" ROFL what a crackpot!

did he make a ... ( 2 years ago by mukoozaphoto)

did he make a campfire and make s'mores on the moon too? what a great camping trip! i like how cernan has to keep explaining himself even after swearing on the Bible.

Notice as soon as ... ( 1 year ago by CaptainUSA)

Notice as soon as sibrel asks him about the shuttle getting close to the van allen belt cernan gets real serious and everything bothers him, his dog sensed it and barked. This is yet more proof all these astronauts are liars and thieves.He lived on the moon! What a jerk, man i went closer to the moon at a pink floyd concert then this clowns ever been.

hey moonmovies man. ... ( 1 year ago by Dstevenb)

hey moonmovies man. Can you shed some light onto a videographer who stalks and trespasses? I am sure you must be the right person to ask. I am a truth seeker. I just want top know why a videographer would stalk and harrass and trespass on people's property just to sell a couple of videos. Do you also know how much a left hook by Aldrin would hurt if it came into contact with my face?

No... but I can ... ( 1 year ago by moonmovies)

No... but I can shed light on the modern day equivalent of 135 Billion dollars spent on a hoax. And 'no' again, but for Aldrin to hit your face would be uncalled for as well, no matter what is said it cannot justify violence. I will agree to disagree with you on that point.

I have never been ... ( 1 year ago by Saerain)

I have never been convinced of the theories, but these astronauts certainly do not take it too well. I am not saying that lends credence either way, but it does lead me to believe that they could be more level-headed about it, even if the interviewer is irritating them.

Who is Sibrel? ... ( 1 year ago by Dstevenb)

Who is Sibrel? Someone called Don Smith took great lengths to explain the actions of a tresspassing videographer. How do employees of this guy know these facts but their boss doesn't? How did they get their hands on secret footage from NASA. Did they order the tape from a menu entitled "Top Secret"? What about D Wilson a Queensland resident who recorded the same feeds from TV interviewed in "Science and Natural Induction" magazine 1973?

i want to belive it ... ( 1 year ago by jubjub1990)

i want to belive it was real i really do, but i just cant. all the evidence against it is too much.

The moon's surface ... ( 1 year ago by moonmovies)

The moon's surface should rapidly move to the left in sequence with the violent touchdown, however the surface remains in the same relative position. Imagine yourself in a spacesuit, holding the camera on top of the LM. When touching down the LM shakes violently but 'your shot' of the moon's surface stays still as if you were floating above the lander.

The reel was sent ... ( 1 year ago by moonmovies)

The reel was sent along with many other reels of requested footage from the Johnson Space Center in Houston. Although the reel is still available today, we do not know whether it was initiallly released by a NASA whistleblower or not. One thing is clear: It is authentic, sent by NASA to Mr. Bart Sibrel, partially seen in this series of YouTube vids.

Yes you can clearly ... ( 1 year ago by moonmovies)

Yes you can clearly see it makes no movement - the craters provide a solid reference point.

Tell a friend: