Advertise On Celebrity Desktop
3,894 Celebrities,
Movies & TV Shows

9,439 Web Links
9,214 Wallpapers
20,000+ Videos

celebrity screen savers and wallpapers
 : Actresses
 : Actors
 : Movies
 : Musicians
 : Models
 : TV Shows
 : Sports
 
celebrity wallpapers
 : Hollywood Stars
   :: Actresses
   :: Actors
   :: Legends
 : Movies
   :: 2008
   :: 2007
   :: 2006
 : Musicians
   :: The Ladies
   :: The Guys
   :: Groups
   :: Legends
 : Supermodels
 : Television Shows
 : Japanese Idols
 : Sports
 : Image Uploader
 : More >>>
 
celebrity videos
 : Music Videos
 : Hollywood TV
 : Movie Clips
 : TV Clips
 : 20,000 more >>>
 
postcards
 : Mug Shots
 : Actresses
 : Actors
 : Musicians
 : Models
 : Upload Your Own
 : More >>>
 
fun and games
 : Smack!
 : Mystery Celebrity
 : Funny Face Warp
 : Without Makeup
 : News & Gossip
 : Odd Baby Names
 : Stupid Quotes
 
shop
 : DVDs
   :: Under $7.49
   :: Under $9.99
   :: TV on DVD
   :: Box Sets
 : Mobile Ringtones
   :: Wallpapers
   :: Screensavers
   :: Videos
   :: Games
 
feedback
 : Comments
 : Submit A Link
 : Suggest A Celebrity
 : Link To Us
 
help center
 : Create Your Own
   Software
 : Installation Help
 : FAQs
 : Spyware / Adware
 : Anti-Virus Programs
 : Security Pitstop
 
   

Why I Support Ron Paul

Uploaded By:
shanedk

Save & Share

Tags: debate paul ron ron-paul

Find more videos in the "News" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

UPDATE: I have a new version of the video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsHbb7ZU_5c
I made this short video of clips from the debate Ron Paul participated in, as well as some facts from his record. I like the looks of Ron Paul; I don't like the looks of any of the other candidates thus far, not even the Libertarians. Unless/until that changes, I'm behind Ron Paul 100%, and this
video shows why. He's a man of honesty, principle, and integrity like this country has not seen in 100 years.

See more videos uploaded by shanedk

Related Videos

Ron Paul in Debate at Reagan Library (May '07)Congressman Ron Paul at the First GOP Presidential DebateRon Paul : Don't tread on me
ron-paul-in-debate-at-reagan-library-may-07.htmlron-paul-in-debate-at-reagan-library-may-07.htmlron-paul-in-debate-at-reagan-library-may-07.html
Ron Paul CNN Late Edition (05/20/07)Why Ron Paul will win (PLEASE READ THE VIDEO DESCRIPTION!)Ron Paul 0wnz the Federal Reserve
ron-paul-in-debate-at-reagan-library-may-07.htmlron-paul-in-debate-at-reagan-library-may-07.htmlron-paul-in-debate-at-reagan-library-may-07.html

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube
"we had to make ... ( 3 months ago by shanedk)
"we had to make sure they did not have nuclear weapons." We were ALREADY sure, according to BOTH sets of UN inspectors, the first led by Scott Ritter and the second by Hans Blix. "why do you think McCain is winning " Because unfortunately most people in this country are as pathetically misinformed as you are.
what you do noy ... ( 3 months ago by zugzwang101)
what you do noy understand is that everyone has a different opinion which you do not understand. Yes McCain is in the lead and Ron Paul has no chance a million to 1. He is an isolationist which this country does not need
The whole "Ron Paul ... ( 3 months ago by shanedk)
The whole "Ron Paul is an isolationist" thing has been debunked MONTHS ago. Even Fox News has stopped saying that! It just goes to show either how ignorant or how dishonest you are.
your ignorant, you ... ( 3 months ago by zugzwang101)
your ignorant, you think that ron paul is the only choice for america. This is the only person that should be voted for. You are wrong because people vote for Romney, Huckabee, and finally for McCain. so what's the problem? McCain 2008
McCain is a ... ( 3 months ago by bkpalmer2004)
McCain is a democrat in disguise. RP'08
Would everyone just ... ( 3 months ago by laniLGHS)
Would everyone just read the Constitution please!!!!! C'Mon sheeple! Ron Paul '08
Going For Gold ... ( 3 months ago by comtoket)
Going For Gold moneybomb still needs over 3m to hit target by Feb 5th !! Please donate today. No amount is too small. Spread the word. ronpaul2008 dot com
Vote Ron Paul and ... ( 3 months ago by 911sheeple)
Vote Ron Paul and open up a real 911 Cover up investigation. The lies just keep piling up by the Bush administration and Marshall Law is not far away.
McCain is a NWO in ... ( 3 months ago by 2muchfuncankillya)
McCain is a NWO in disguise. There is no difference any more between Dems and Reps. They are all NWO freaks that care only about lining their own pockets and handing themselves total power.
RON PAUL tells the truth about this, and that's why they try to push him out of debates, and why you see losers like O'Reilly talking crap on him all the time.
Array ( 3 months ago by TokFaen)
Ron is true.
But you Americans have to accept the human evolution. God is ganna be the biggest lie of the history of man in a few hundred years. And something is very strange. Ron is against war and killing, but he still says people should have right to have guns. Thats abit like saying against himself, isnt
it?
No, it isn't. If ... ( 3 months ago by shanedk)
No, it isn't. If you have the right to your life, you have a right to defend your life. Plain and simple. It's the people who believe in gun control who are for the killing--since criminals by definition don't obey the law and will always be able to get guns.
Just what we need! ... ( 2 months ago by skyhalk012)
Just what we need! ron paul ftw! we don't want another bomb thing going on with the wtc lols, and god is never the lie of anything!
zugs, we don't want ... ( 2 months ago by skyhalk012)
zugs, we don't want mcCain for president, he isn't smart! he was enrolled in this school type thing and he ranked 894/999 at graduation... RON PAUL '08!!
error lol...894/899 ... ( 2 months ago by skyhalk012)
error lol...894/899. sorry for that RON PAUL '08!!
Deontology (duty ... ( 3 weeks ago by hmv12321)
Deontology (duty ethics) agrees with you. However, I'm a consequentialist. What matters for me is the amount of crime first because I value life over defense. I agree that if we ban guns then some criminals will still be able to get ahold of them. However, recently being mugged, I don't think a majority of criminals would be able to do so. I think the reduction in availability of guns would save more lives than defensive measures taken with guns (I couldn't have pulled a gun in my position).
What you THINK ... ( 3 weeks ago by shanedk)
What you THINK isn't relevant. The evidence shows that FAR more crimes are prevented by armed citizens than would EVER be prevented by gun control.
What I think ... ( 3 weeks ago by hmv12321)
What I think determines how I vote - thus, insofar as the democratic issue is concerned, it is of a modicum of relevance. I'm just saying I find it not to be such a simple issue. Legality of guns helps ward off criminals, but also makes it easier to be one, but illegality of guns makes it more difficult to ward off criminals, but makes it more difficult to become a criminal. You have a reasonable position, and may be right - use that reason to convince people and overcome their emotions.
But it isn't a ... ( 3 weeks ago by shanedk)
But it isn't a democratic issue, because we aren't a democracy. You can't vote your rights away. We have a right to defend ourselves, form mutual protection societies, hire security, etc. That is EXACTLY how it's legitimate for the government to have a police force and a military in the first place! Without the right of self-defense, the rest crumbles.
I disagree, but ... ( 3 weeks ago by hmv12321)
I disagree, but that mean I'm right. But here's my case: if we vote to outlaw guns, then we give up a freedom (a right) to carry guns in an attempt to protect our right to life. This might be effective, or it might exacerbate the problem. We do have the choice (as far as we can influence the legislature) about the law. Keep in mind, though, the outlaw of citizens carrying guns doesn't include the police force and military. The debate becomes should we disarm our citizens to disarm our enemies?
No, because in ... ( 3 weeks ago by shanedk)
No, because in order to get there we have to determine that disarming ourselves WOULD disarm our enemies, and all of the evidence says that it wouldn't. Then there's the issue of what happens when the police and the military become corrupt. Who watches the watchmen? Finally, even getting past all that, as Ben Franklin said, those who would give up their essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
If the evidence ... ( 3 weeks ago by hmv12321)
If the evidence supports it, by all means. As per who watches the watchmen, gun control would have mattered in the days when militia stood a chance against the military, but today it wouldn't do so well. We can still watch our watchmen, but not with guns - we have to resort to other methods (democracy?). That is a good point, though. Last, we give up our liberty to drive fast in order to keep all people from speeding. Is that not to be commended? So, if the evidence works, I'm with you.
Typo in the first ... ( 3 weeks ago by hmv12321)
Typo in the first line: I meant "I disagree, but that doesn't mean I'm right."
That is actually ... ( 2 weeks ago by stuntmonk14)
That is actually not true at all. An increase in guns has been proven to lead to an increase in crime, not a decrease. Where are you getting your facts?
All i have to say ... ( 9 hours ago by SoldierCyfix)
All i have to say is
RON PAUL !! you know the rest



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 
:: Copyright 1998-2008 Celebrity Desktop - All Rights Reserved :: Terms of Use :: Privacy Policy :: Search :: Ad Info ::
Webmasters, earn $$$ to support your site with: ValueClick :: Casale Media :: AllPosters :: TotemCash