BBC reports WTC 7 fell 23 minutes too soon

Uploaded By:
BadCase

Save & Share

Tags: 911 truth wtc

Find more videos in the "News" category

Want to embed this video on your blog or e-mail it to a friend? Scroll down for tools.

http://abuse-of-power.org
This video is protected under Fair Use Laws www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
This is excerpts from a BBC World News report in which a reporter states WTC 7 has fallen when it is clearly visible behind her.

See more videos uploaded by BadCase

Related Videos

WTC7 Collapse - 23 Minute Warning!! - Part 1 of 3 -	New NEWS - BBC Video - WTC 7 - Prior Knowledge	BBC Reported Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

WTC 7 Foreknowledge	BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell	WTC 1 Explosion

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Which wine goes ... ( 1 year ago by cortmeister262)

Which wine goes best when you're eating crow? Hmm? Well, you're absolutely RIGHT about the building in question being bldg 7 BadCase! I went to the BBC site and they concede that IS Bldg. 7 in the background! So look at me with egg on my face! DOOoh! Does that mean that the 9/11 conspiracy was as wide as you imply? I still don't think that Bush would be tipping off the BBC, but I've been wrong before!

My question to you ... ( 1 year ago by topformfitness)

My question to you is this, then: when asked to provide tapes of this footage to review the BBC claimed that is was "missing"... even though they ALWAYS keep at least 3 copies of news footage (one in a vault). Look it up.

I agree with you ... ( 1 year ago by cortmeister262)

I agree with you 100%! Why didn't the 911 Commission demand that the BBC turn over those tapes? I think that the Bush administration has let it be known that they don't really want to get to the bottom of the failures in intelligence failures. The whole investigation was never taken seriously.

The brown building ... ( 1 year ago by sebcartwright)

The brown building at 2:41 happens to be the wrong shape for 7 WTC. In fact, other than both buildings being brown, it shares little resemblance at all to 7 WTC. There's another building that would be about the right shape... but that building is blue.

(cont'd) Also, how ... ( 1 year ago by sebcartwright)

(cont'd) Also, how do I know this is the 5 PM Bulletin? It could be the 6 PM Bulletin. Additionally, during breaking news, they have breaking news bulletins every 30 minutes. So, this bulletin could have been from the 5:30 bulletin.

(cont'd) Also, the ... ( 1 year ago by sebcartwright)

(cont'd) Also, the BBC does not keep a copy of every second of footage off of every camera "in a vault." Tons of footage is either destroyed, recorded over, or never taped to begin with. Chances are, they were not even recording this footage on the camera because it wasn't a news report, it was a live interview. The only copy the BBC has of this, if they have any, would be the exact same thing we have here, the programme out. So...... yeah. That's pretty much your entire argument there.

OMG how dumb can ... ( 1 year ago by BadCase)

OMG how dumb can people be the BBC has admitted everything I have said in the video google "BBC part_of_the_conspiracy" its the 4th link down they did record it and did save it and then they all turned up missing

you know nothing ... ( 1 year ago by BadCase)

you know nothing about BBC World News' policy about retaining footage because you haven't asked them yourself, I have they have a triple redundancy storage system for all of their footage.

oh if you still ... ( 1 year ago by BadCase)

oh if you still dont think its WTC7 ask cortmeister262 we had a good discussion about it

It's irrelevant if ... ( 1 year ago by sebcartwright)

It's irrelevant if they have a triple redundancy storage policy because if it's a live interview it was probably never recorded in the first place other than the programme out. They most definitely do not keep every second of footage in a vault and if they do have three copies, it will be three copies of the programme out, which doesn't do much good since it will be identical to the footage you have here. Crazy conspiracy theorists.

Also, unless ... ( 1 year ago by sebcartwright)

Also, unless there's another brown building just behind her, it is without a doubt the wrong shape. I have tons of photos of the building in books and it doesn't look like the brown building over her shoulder. And I still don't know that this is the 5 PM bulletin. Just pause the footage at 2:45. There's a brown building that's definitely not 7 WTC. There's a glass building... which isn't brown.

Dude you are what ... ( 1 year ago by BadCase)

Dude you are what Carlos Mencia would call a DEE,DEE,DEE if you could take your head out of your ass and google "BBC part_of_the_conspiracy" you would see that they admit to everything I have said the only theorist here is you since you have no facts and only theory and I have only verified facts, keep opening your mouth your IQ becomes more and more apparent each time you do.

the brown building ... ( 1 year ago by BadCase)

the brown building is directly in front of WTC 7, WTC 7 is visible above and to the right of the brown building. Look at my most recent video to see a video response to corts claim that it was not WTC7 in the video he has since conceded that it is WTC 7.

My IQ is " ... ( 1 year ago by sebcartwright)

My IQ is "approaching genius" as a matter of fact... 155... or is that irrelevant?

Thats nice mine ... ( 1 year ago by BadCase)

Thats nice mine falls in the genius category, have you found your way to the bbc site to read what they have to say yet

k so this proves ... ( 1 year ago by friendlyal32)

k so this proves what......?

this video proofs ... ( 1 year ago by 4bd13l)

this video proofs what i did not understand nothing about it I say its fake

This is an actual ... ( 11 months ago by fred10538)

This is an actual recording from the BBC that day. The so-called "Salaman brother's building is actually behind correspondant Jane Stanley's head, and when she turns to point to the WTC smoke, she is actually looking directly at the building that they just reported has collapsed" What this means is, that the person who provided the script for them to read, either got his wires crossed, or had foreknowledge that the building was going to collapse!

no no no. one of ... ( 11 months ago by retardothemonkey)

no no no. one of the WTC towers did collapse but you see the other WTC tower was still there dont get confused and the picture on this vid is so good so dont say this building is gone and that ones still there unless its stands out alot which (besides the one WTC tower) none of those buildings stood out that much and you dont knwo the pint of veiw so you might be looksing at something different

what? ( 11 months ago by BadCase)

what?

The combined weight ... ( 9 months ago by MrDicusBigus)

The combined weight of the towers was more than 1.5 million tons. 1Each tower was built to safely sway about three feet during strong wind stormsand -this is on wikipedia by the way ..and now you "SUPPOSE" that they were not to come down by 23 min ...Right...

Array ( 8 months ago by andytillott)

Type in:
WTC 7 - PULL IT by Larry Silverstein
The building didn't collapse it was pulled (It's incredible how demolition experts were brought in to do this massive job in only a few hours. Here's me thinking that an operation like that takes weeks of planning and setting up! Incredible ;)

this video is about ... ( 8 months ago by BadCase)

this video is about WTC 7 not the towers it is a another building that fell on 9/11. WTC 7 fell at 5:23 pm but BBC reported that it fell at 5:00, did you even watch the video? wikipedia.....roflmao

wikipedia is ... ( 2 months ago by daivdmorre)

wikipedia is usually wrong its not validated...anyone can add a page so it could be false

Tell a friend: